Luke 8:17~ For nothing is hidden which will not become manifest, nor secret which shall not be known and come to light.
And we get there with the help of each other. So you will see a joint effort here, of conversations I’ve had with cracker, brenda, nathalie and ray, and how each piece of the puzzle gives us a good picture of the whole.
So let’s begin.

If we look at the etymology of the word eclipse we find it means, “an abandonment, a failing, a forsaking.” Doesn’t “forsaking” sound Biblical?
Matthew 27: 46
From the death of Jesus
And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

So is the eclipsing of the sun a good thing? Something we should celebrate? The “sun/son” being forsaken? Yet we give it all our energy. We go out and watch it, set up blankets, cameras, camcorders. Make special trips to go see it.
My friend ray gave me some interesting info on how this event was being celebrated. Let’s see what kind of festivals they were. Maybe it will shed more light on what this event really means.
https://www.moonstock2017.com/
So I didn’t get to witness the eclipse myself. I lived too far away from it. So I am relying on people I know that did see it first hand. I discussed with two of them, cracker and brenda kay.
Here’s my conversation with brenda, edited to take out my false assumptions for the sake of clarity.
brenda~rosette, I’m in Tampa, Florida and was going to head to Hayesville, North Carolina for the eclipse. The local news channel in Tampa has a weather man in Hayesville and shown still pictures of traffic piled high into this town. I called four of my friends to check this out. It is so false. As of Saturday at 1 pm there is no stampede. Do you think someone is trying to keep people from coming? I am going any ways.


rosette~Totally brenda. They never want people looking at eclipses right? They always tell us to look indirectly at them or they will burn our eyes. Really? If it’s just the moon passing in front of the sun how does that differ than when we see the sun in our sky WITHOUT the moon? Would be more damaging THEN right? and people sun gaze. So, then, why do they tell us this? Because we could possibly SEE something that will change our perception? We need to look at the eclipse. Watch every aspect of it and see if there is any sort of anomaly. So yeah, the fewer people there LIVE the less chance of someone seeing something really enlightening and sharing it with others. So they make up that bull shit about traffic. The eclipse will be seen across the WHOLE U.S. from west to east coast so how are they going to stop that?
So I was thinking here that it was a THIRD body that passed in front of the sun, the one that they call Rahu. However, after seeing these filtered images of the moon that cracker linked I beg to differ! I will show them shortly.
Now we KNOW the Moon is NOT SOLID. It is opaque.
Here it is during the day. You can CLEARLY see sky THROUGH the moon. Where the holes are is the SAME color as the sky. If it was solid the holes would be grey.
And at night with a good enough camera or telescope you can see stars THROUGH the moon as well!
rosette~Yeah a SOLID cover says much! THAT’S what they don’t want people to see! Hence saying looking directly at it will blind you! cracker said he looked directly at it and was fine!

So in conversing with cracker he made some interesting comments as well.
rosette~Are you going to watch the eclipse tomorrow?
cracker~Yeah I need to find something to look through. Those glasses creep me out. Remind me of the virtual reality glasses they gave people in the weird move “Revelation”.
rosette~I think you can look directly at it. Are they hiding something?
cracker~I think so too. Not sure about hiding anything but I think it’s being a bit sensationalized and used as a commercialized money making scheme. Funny how the shadow is only 80 miles wide when the moon is 2160 miles in diameter supposedly. Shadows never are smaller than the objects that make them if cast on directly in line with the light source. They can only be bigger. So that tells me the moon can be no bigger than 80 miles in diameter, not 2160. The closer the light source, the bigger the shadow. It makes no sense what we are being told. Amazes me how people, even myself could not see something so obvious before.
This guy in Australia posted a video of the sun and moon in the sky at the same time and the part of the moon that was lit up was not even the part facing the sun. So how can the sun and moon be in the sky at the same time right next to each other and only see one-fourth of the moon?
rosette~And why does the moon wax and wane? I think the light is internal. Like the sun’s light. Wax and wane is not tied to the sun because the moon moves slower yet the waxing and waning are at regular intervals.
cracker~And notice when the sun and moon are in the sky at the same time. The shadow should change since they move at different speeds. It doesn’t. The phase changes at it’s own pace.
rosette~Yep. Strange thing though, if they are both 80 miles or less, and even appear in my local clouds, how can they be in West Virginia at the same time? The eclipse for me will happen from 6:20 am to 7:20 am, although only a third will be covered by the moon. But HOW can we see the same thing you see thousands of miles away if its only 80 miles or less?
cracker~Think about an LED light shining on the top of a large round table. Where is the light visible on the table. And how close does it have to be to not light the whole tabletop up and leave half in the dark.
cracker~It was clear the whole time. Got kind of an orange color outside. Reminded me of how the light changes when you smoke DMT actually. It was too bright to see much of anything but the shadow. I hope other people got some good shots of it. I looked. No headaches. No blindness. Just fine.
They scare us by saying we could damage our eyes if we look directly at it. Really? cracker was just fine.
They even have the photos of the first family wearing them to set an example for everyone else. Pure propaganda.
We also have NASA propaganda and other obviously CGI’ed photos. In this one they perpetuate the myth that the sun is a giant gas ball ready to annihilate us. If you look at the sun through a Nikon P-900 lens, you will see that it is a uniform yellow color throughout. Not orange, not fiery, just yellow with no distinguishing features, as you would expect of a “light”. “light for day”.
From NASA’s own website we get, “The total solar eclipse begins near Lincoln City, Oregon, at 10:15 a.m. PDT (1:15 p.m. EDT). Totality ends at 2:48 p.m. EDT near Charleston, South Carolina. The partial eclipse will start earlier and end later, but the total eclipse itself will take about one hour and 40 minutes to cross the country. NASA will fund a host of science projects that will occur during this unique period of time.“
Can someone explain to me how when the sun goes across our sky from east to west, (rises in the east, sets in the west), that the eclipse actually goes from west (Oregon) to east (South Carolina)? Huh?
This “photo” is captioned, “Image of the Moon transiting across the Sun, taken by SDO in 304 angstrom extreme ultraviolet light on Aug. 21, 2017. And credited: NASA/SDO.” So hilarious.
The object covering the moon was completely solid and BLACK. You could NOT see the moon THROUGH the sun. This is a fake.
Now if we look at the phase of the moon on the 21st we see its a NEW moon. What is a new moon? One in which the moon has it’s light off. So that is convenient for the ones trying to deceive us. No one asks though, if it’s invisible, see through, how can it become, visible, solid, when passing over the sun? And then once it leaves the front of the sun, it is invisible once again? It is magic? It defies all laws of physics, of the PHYSICAL.
We are told that it is always a NEW moon in front of the sun during a solar eclipse. Well how convenient is that! Too convenient. Because its NOT true. It’s NOT the moon.
What other ways do they try to cover up the truth about the eclipse? Well how about by trying to BLOCK our view?
From my friend nathalie, she writes, “Also just throwing this info out there. I have in my life flown back and forth coast to coast many times. If possible I always get a window seat and always spend the flight looking out the window. I recollect from my younger days, that when we got to cruising speed, above the clouds, the sky would be a lovely blue and very bright. Now I haven’t flown coast to coast for many years but just did so this weekend, and also now they have those lovely built in computers that tell you speed, altitude, and where you are. So we cruised about 47,000 feet, way above the clouds and slightly above what I am going to call this disgusting yellowish/light brownish smog. The smog stuff layer began in Boston and NEVER abated all the way to San Francisco. Above this layer is blue clear sky. I expected the layer to come and go, but no we are completely covered by this shit and it is up around 40-42,000 feet. I have never seen this before. I don’t know if anyone obsessively looks out airplane windows but if they do would love to know what they see. I never saw actually chem-planes trailing during my flight, but I could see the residue of what they had left behind a few hours earlier. I also took a piece of cardboard and held it across the smog horizon line, since the line never changed, it was always straight and it was indeed straight as far as I could stretch the cardboard across two airplane windows. So yeah, shit is happening and it ain’t nice shit.”

And to divert us with Rahu-
In Indian Astrology, Rahu is the eternal enemy of the Sun and Moon, and he is a THIRD celestial body that eclipses them. He catches them by surprise and only comes out when the Moon is NEW.
Rahu is always depicted as a dark circle or eating a circle. From the Wiki, “
In Hindu tradition, Rahu is a severed head of an asura, that swallows the sun causing eclipses. He is depicted in art as a serpent with no body riding a chariot drawn by eight black horses (notice the number eight, like the eight pointed star of the real Illuminati families which symbolized blue blood).
And like Sleipnir, the eight legged horse in Norse Mythology. They put the eight horses into one and just give it eight legs. This would be the Norse version of Rahu.
Rahu is one of the navagrahas (nine planets) in Vedic astrology and is paired with Ketu. The time of day considered to be under the influence of Rahu is called Rahu kala and is considered inauspicious. In Vedic astronomy, Rahu is considered to be a rogue planet.”
A rogue planet? A rebellious star? Lucifer?
Rahu is depicted here on the Chinese Wheel of Fortune, which has its counterpart in the Tarot. Notice in the Tarot it is on card ROMAN numeral X. Like Planet X? The Destroyer?
And when I looked up pictures of Rahu this came up. Notice its the Star of David! A Zionist connection here? And also notice the Star is within an EIGHT pointed star. Remember, the EIGHT pointed star is the Star of the Saturnalia Brotherhood, the real Illuminati families controlling the world. OCTOgon. The Black Cube.
Notice on this chart, it shows Rahu as Alpha, and Ketu as Omega.. usurping? Oh but wait, we see the DARK Moon, Lilith on this chart as well. Remember Lilith is the female side of Lucifer. So when the sun gets eclipsed, “Lilith” comes out.
But what does the Bible say on Rahu?
Genesis 1:15 – 17
The Fourth Day: Sun, Moon, Stars
15: And let them be for lights in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth; and it was so. 16: God made the two great lights, the greater light to govern the day, and the lesser light to govern the night; He made the stars also. 17: God placed them in the expanse of the heavens to give light on the earth.
Nowhere does it mention this supposed third body, this Rahu. So is there one?
Check out these images from a vid shared with me by cracker.
Here’s a link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wppHpnCC9k
They are using different filters on actual eclipse images. Notice they are NOT showing two bodies but only one- that of the sun! There is NO MOON or other object crossing over the sun! NO RAHU!


What is DOES show is that the sun is SELF ECLIPSING. Wow! Now doesn’t that make sense?
The moon, the light for night, is self eclipsing, they are called phases of the moon. New moon, first quarter, full moon, last quarter. So why wouldn’t the sun, the light for day, do it as well? Is it some sort of recharging mechanism?
It’s so timely isn’t it? That the most iconic song for this event, Black Hole Sun, would gain attention right before the event, with the death of the singer Chris Cornell? And tell me Chris doesn’t look “devilish” here? CC is 33.
It reminds me of when NASA miraculously discovered water on the moon when Matt Damon’s movie The Martian came out. Wow the timing is incredible! Not staged at all. No way. Yeah right!
Related
Hey rosette,
Love your work and dedication to Truth, but if the sun is self eclipsing, how do you explain annular eclipses and the areas on Earth who only see partial or none at all?
-jeremy
Aloha jeremy, I obviously don’t have all the answers. I don’t know anyone that does. It’s a group effort trying to work all these anomalies out. My speculation is that annular eclipses would just be another way that the sun self eclipses. Just like the moon when it waxes and wanes. It doesn’t have the same pattern every time. Sometimes there is a straight line between the light and dark half, sometimes curved. And a YT friend just commented that he remembers in 2011 seeing the moon in its crescent shape but facing downwards. So that’s really odd! As for the seeing only a portion is different areas I don’t know. Can you explain how the eclipse traveled opposite the normal sun’s path? It went from west to east! We could see one third of the sun eclipsed here in Hawaii so maybe its the viewing angle, us being by the Tropic of Cancer. Mahalo, rosette
I agree, we are all sifting through the bs to hopefully get to the Truth. It is very frustrating at times but “seek and ye shall find.” All will be revealed very soon!!
As for me, i still think the luminaries are circling above us and that the moon eclipses the sun. As of now, I have no reason to believe it is something else since the moon is always in the immediate area during an eclipse. How it specifically works i don’t know. The moon is very mysterious…part material/physical, part ethereal/spiritual? I also question whether or not there have always been eclipses, maybe the sun and moon were always opposite each other in perfect balance during the higher ages?? Sun ruled the day, moon ruled the night.
Also, the moon is not always exactly on the ecliptic, but wanders a bit which is why there isn’t an eclipse every new moon. Another thing to note is the moons movement from tropic to tropic. Even though the moon is traveling slower in it’s circular path, it is much faster moving north and south, approximately 8000 miles in 28 days. (Assuming its around 4000 miles from t of cancer to t of capricorn). It takes the sun 365 days to complete this trip.
Just my thoughts of course.
Here is a link to a good video by D. Marble explaining the shadow moving west to east…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5z5-9RAZbKE
On a side note, my partner and i will be in Maui in a few weeks:) would love to hop over to Oahu and meet up with a fellow Truth seeker if time and money allow it. You can send me a private email if you want.
Peace and Love,
jeremy
interesting thoughts there. Especially the black hole sun. The coincidence of the artist dying is too strong really to be coincidence in my mind.
I came across an image of the eclipse in an article which I thought was interesting. I think it was taken by the article writer although not 100% sure. It has the magazine name on the image an no other credit for it. unexpected source. The image is here: http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/bmw/2018-bmw-k1600b-first-ride-review.html/attachment/082517-2018-bmw-k1600b-total-solar-eclipse-kwp_6285
I thought it was interesting in a couple ways. 1st, when I downloaded it and ran some filters on it, hue, saturation, curves etc. Photoshop or Gimp would work. When you jack the levels right up, it “appears” like the surface features start to become visible. However I am not sure it isn’t just the camera CMOS sensor recording different shades which start to look like surface features as the levels are changed or perhaps it’s chemtrail/cloud cover causing differences in what the CMOS is detecting. I understand a lot of spraying occurred before the eclipse. I’ve seen a lot of images with cloud/chem debris passing in front of the sun during the eclipse.
The 2nd thing I thought was interesting was the upper right (2 o’clock) area of the edge or limb of the eclipsing body. It appears to show an irregular surface quite clearly. I don’t think this is something you see of the moon. The moon looks like a very clean circle from here.
When I look at the image it gives me the impression that this body is very close to us. Perhaps not even tens of thousands of miles away. I was hoping someone else might take a look at it and see if they agree with either of the things I think I am observing.
Is there a body up there that is basically invisible in our light spectrum? Is that one of the reasons for all the spraying? “Scientists” have regular stated that there is some kind of body in our solar system that they can’t seem to get a visual on, although they say it’s gravitational affects appear to be real. It appears in the news maybe every year or so. Is this it? Are they hinting at it. Is this what the Vaticans LUCIFER observer looking for?
Anyway great read as always Rosette. Thanks.
Aloha 303,
Another anomaly was that the eclipse ran backwards. It went from west coast to east coast. How can that happen? The moon and the sun rotate in the same direction although the moon is much slower. That in itself makes me think it’s not the moon. Self-eclipsing makes much more sense. The moon self-eclipses, so why not the sun? And there is no mention of an “invisible” body referred to as the black hole sun in the Bible. It is THEM taking advantage of our imagination’s again? The moon and sun are definitely not the distance away that mainstream science purports. They are UNDER the firmament.
What artist died?
And it would be great to see shots of images you got from running different filters? Is there a way you could share that with us?
Mahalo, rosette
Hello Rosette,
You mentioned the singer of “Black hole sun” had died just before the eclipse.
I didn’t take the image. I posted a URL to the image location in my previous post if anyone is interested. I loaded it into a image editor, photoshop or GIMP will do. Then I played around with things like hue and saturation, contrast, brightness. The disc went from black to patches of dark grey to blacks. Similar to looking at the surface of the moon, it has lighter and darker patches. The shapes of these patches did not match the ones we see on the moons surface. I don’t know if it is the camera that was used, chem trail clouds in front of the disc or if I’m seeing the actual surface of this disc. I might see if I can save some and put somewhere for downloading or viewing. Might take some time. But if others want to play around with the original image themselves its linked in the previous post I submitted. Or maybe download it and zoom in with an image viewer on the top right edge and see if they can see the uneven surface that gives me the impression it is much closer than the moon is.
Thanks