I felt it necessary to make this presentation because so many of you learned of The Oera Linda Book (OLB) through Robert Sepher, Asha Logos or Jan Ott. Or, read the OLB on your own, and then went on YouTube to find videos on it and came upon their work and took it to be the truth.

You have to remember that if the work is important to us, to help us in our awakening, of who we truly ARE, something that can INSPIRE us to be FREE, the MAGI will put people in place to be the leaders of this “opposition”. Of course this is to control us, so that we don’t get to the truth!

The warnings of the Burgh Matrons shout down to us, “Watch! Watch! Watch!”

So let’s take a brief look at Robert Sepehr and Asha Logos before we look at Jan Ott’s work.

Watch!

Robert Sepehr

For starters, and what should be the biggest alarm bell, is that Robert Sepehr is Jewish. Just do a quick Google search and you will see this fact. And by the time you get to the end of my presentation, you will see that the Jews ARE the Magi of the OLB. They are the enemy of the Fryans. So do we really think he would give us an accurate account of the OLB? Of course not.

Jews = Magi

If we take a look at his last name, Sepehr, we see that it is short for Sephirot, which are the emanations of the Kabbalistic Tree of Life. The Kabbala is one of the Magi teachings that they use against us.

Sepehr~ Sephirot

And if we listen to his presentation on the OLB we see that he incorrectly calls the Burgh Matrons “priestesses”, spinning it so we will think of them as PAGAN priestesses. Many people won’t even read the OLB because they have this preconceived notion that the OLB is Pagan. It is NOT. We know that Burgh Matrons were the keepers of the morals, the teachers of the children, the advice givers, NOT Pagans, NOT priestesses, NOT middle women between Wralda and the people. There were ZERO priestesses or priests in Fryan society. The Fryans had a DIRECT connection to Wralda, no middle man or middle woman needed.

And who are known as the middle men? The SAME men who come between us and God (priests), the SAME men who come between us and money (bankers), the SAME men who come between us and merchandise (merchants). And who are the priests, bankers and merchants? Who have ALWAYS been the middle men? The Jews, also known as the Magi.

Watch!

Asha Logos

Then we have Asha Logos who wows people with his soothing music and mesmerizing voice. What does he really tell us about the OLB? He talks in a round about way, using fancy words, explaining who the Fryans were and what they did, but doesn’t really tell us much of anything. His presentations on the OLB are the politically correct versions, like potatoes with no meat.

And his name is somewhat sketchy as well. Asha means “existence” in Greek and Logos is the name used by the Theosophist’s, the Luciferian’s for their God. And is heavily used in Gnosticism.

Notice “truth” is in quotes here, meaning this “truth” is subjective!

One of the most famous Theosophists, Helena Blavatsky used the term LOGOS extensively in her writings. Blavatsky states in her book Theosophical Articles and Notes that, “When the term LOGOS, the mystic divine voice of every nation and philosophy, comes to be better understood, then only will come the first glimmering of THE DAWN OF THE ONE UNIVERSAL RELIGION.”

So Asha Logos would mean, “Existence of the Universal Voice of the One World Religion.” Doesn’t sound very pro Fryan.

Watch!

Jan Ott

And Asha Logos wrote the foreword in Jan Ott’s book Codex Oera Linda. They always seem to partner up.

Ott has a You Tube channel called Oera Linda.

Catherine Austin Fitts

And if you look at his play list, you can see that he recently was interviewed by Catherine Austin Fitts. In the interview she asked Ott if the OLB could be a hoax. He didn’t give a very convincing answer as to why it WASN’T a hoax. MAGI and their cohorts, would love for Fryans to think the book is a hoax, because they know how important the book really is.

If you are not familiar with Fitts, she is a regular on The Alex Jones show. A show which is a honey pot to catch the newly awakened. Remember they control the opposition by leading it, with people like Alex Jones and Catherine Austin Fitts.

Alex Jones

Red Ice Radio

So Ott was on with Fitts, and before that he was a guest on Red Ice Radio, otherwise known as FED ICE, which is ANOTHER honey pot to attract the newly awakened so they can control what information they get.

And then we have this interview of Ott, where the positioning of the book in front of the interviewer is very staged. He is seeing with his LEFT eye, the LEFT Hand Path, the SINister Path.

Remember the photo of Madge? We know there are a TON more people in Hollywood, in the Media, in government, that show their allegiance this way.

Magi versus Magi

That 1984 IS now, with fake wars between Eurasia and Oceania, and then the next day between Oceania and Eastasia. Just like the fake wars NOW between Russia and Ukraine. Why aren’t the Ukrainians speak up about it then? Because they get a free ticket to a Western Nation with all the benefits.

And just like the massive surveillance grid on us NOW.

Tracking us with our phones, through drones, and cameras set up at every street corner and on every building. No more privacy. Police state.

Huzza!

William R. Sandbach

And although I don’t trust Sepehr, Asha Logos or Ott’s interpretations of the OLB, I DO trust William R. Sandbach’s translation.

Huzza!

Alwyn J. Raubenheimer

And I DO trust the work of Alwyn J. Raubenheimer, who ALSO trusted William R. Sandbach’s translation, and used it in his book Chronicles from Pre-Celtic Europe.

It’s too bad that Raubenheimer recently traveled to his Watch Star. I would have loved to talk to him about his book and excellent research on the OLB.

Comparing the Translations

So after reading both versions, Sandbach’s (in Raubenheimer’s book), and Ott’s, I found some peculiar places where the translations differed and changed the meaning of the stories.

I came to the conclusion that one translation is authentic, and is passing down the true history of the Fryan race to WARN their future brethren,

while the other is a watered down Universalist book, taking out all the biblical connections and clouding the references of the very people that are the Fryans enemies to this day.

These differences I want to share with you here. The photos of the book I will be showing you are from Raubenheimer’s, but I do have Ott’s and will be quoting from it.

First, I wanted to mention that, for people saying that Raubenheimer would have approved of Ott’s translation, here is proof that that is NOT the case. He was GOOD with Sandbach’s version, and only slightly edited the translation. He writes, “Some editing was done where it was felt that Sandbach’s translation does not reflect the ORIGINAL FRISIAN MEANING.” You will see that in the places that I take issue, Raubenheimer did NOT change the meaning from the original, while Ott DID.

The Magi

One of the most important differences that I saw was how Ott changed MAGI or MAGYARAR (MAGY for short), from the original text, to MAGUS in his translation. By doing this we lose the connection from the Magi of the Oera Linda time, to the Magi of the present. The Magi of the OLB is the same Magi that is trying to wipe out Frya and rule the world today. There is no reason to change the actual word in the OLB, MAGI, to a different spelling.

Unless someone wanted to hide their identity.

There are lots of examples where Ott has done this, for example, the story of Woden and the Magi, on page 88 in Codex Oera Linda, he refers to the head Magi as the Magus, and throughout the story. In Raubenheimer’s text of the same story, you can see he uses either Magy or Magi.

Raubenheimer’s version:

“Wodin was strong, fierce, and warlike, but he was not clear sighted, therefore he was caught in their snares and crowned by the MAGI.“

Ott’s version:

“Wodin was strong, fierce, and heroic, but was not clear-sighted. Therefore, he was caught in their trap and crowned by the MAGUS.“

The Original text:

“Woden was sterik wost and wigandlik men hi nas navt klar.sjande. Therthrvch warth.I in hjara mera fvngen and thrvch thene MAGI kroneth.”

Using the word MAGI is important because it was used from then up through the 19th Century for these enemies of Frya.

Look at Arthur de Gobineau’s work, written in 1855, titled, The Inequality of the Human Races, and you will see he uses the same terms, MAGI and MAGYAR.

The first mention of MAGI in his book is on page 12 at the very bottom. Gobineau writes, “The Persian Empire at the time of its fall was wholly under the…

…sway of the MAGI.”

Further in his book he goes into who the Magi ( Magyars) are. He says, “The Magyars are of Finnish origin, and allied to the Laplanders, Samoyedes (Sami), and Eskimos. These are all people of low stature, with wide faces and prominent cheek-bones, yellowish or dirty brown in colour. The Magyars, however, are tall and well set up; their limbs are long, supple and vigorous, their features are of marked beauty, and resemble those of white nations. The Finns have always been weak, unintelligent, and oppressed. The Magyars take a high place among the conquerors of the world. They have enslaved others, but have never been slaves themselves. Thus, since the Magyars are Finns and are so different, physically and morally, from all the other…

…branches of their primitive stock, they must have changed enormously.”

Then in the second to last paragraph he explains that, “The name “Huns” may denote a nation, but it is also, historically speaking, a collective word. The mass of tribes to which it refers is not homogenous. Among the crowd of peoples enrolled under the banner of Attila’s ancestors, certain bands, known as the “White Huns,” have always been distinguished. In these the Germanic element predominated.”

And in the last paragraph, “Thus Magyars are White Huns, though they have been wrongly made out to be a yellow race, a confusion caused by their intermarriages in the past (whether voluntary or other-…

…wise) with Mongolians. They are really, as we have shown, crossbreeds with a Germanic basis.”

So we can see from Gobineau’s writings that the MAGI, are a MIXED race of Frya and Finda (Mongolian) and lived in the region of Finland. Gobineau states in error that they came FROM Finland. We know from the OLB and later historians, that the MAGI traveled FROM THE EAST and split up, a portion going up to Finland and a portion going down to the region of Hungary.

And that the Finns weren’t MAGI, but a Finda race, which we know as the Sami. Also that they WERE crossed with a Germanic race, our FRYAN people, just like it says in the OLB. Like when they tricked Woden to become their king and he had children with the Magi’s daughter, giving them his Fryan blood.

MAGY IS SHORT FOR MAGYAR AND MAGYARAR

SAMI IS SHORT FOR SAMOYED

We can see here that SAMI is ALSO a URALIC language like Finnish. So the SAMI are the FINDA in the OLB that came with the MAGI to FINLAND. The MAGI spoke FINNISH and the SAMOYED spoke SAMI.

Mag-Rab ~ Magi-Rabbi

Like Gobineau, Raubenheimer makes some great connections with the Magi as well. On page 250 of Raubenheimer’s book, he writes, “We encounter the Magi on various occasions in the Bible where it was translated from the Greek ‘Magos’ to ‘Wise Men’.

In E.F. Murphy’s Handbook for Spiritual Warfare he gives the following definition: The Greek word is magos. It can be translated ‘magician, sorcerer, wizard, enchanter, astrologer’ or simply ‘wise men’. F. F. Bruce explains how the term was used in the ancient world: ‘The magi were originally a Median priest caste, but in later Greek and Roman times the word was used more generally of practitioners of all sorts of magic or quackery’.”

Raubenheimer continues, “From the Smith’s Bible Dictionary gives a somewhat different explanation: The Magi took their places among “the astrologers and stargazers and monthly prognosticators.” It is with such men that we have to think of Daniel and his fellow exiles as associated. The office which Daniel accepted, Dan. 5:11, was probably RAB- MAG- Chief of the MAGI. The word presented itself to the Greeks as connected with a foreign system of divination, and it soon became a byword for the worst form of imposter. This is the predominant meaning of the word as it appears in the New Testament. Acts 8:9; 13:8.3. In one memorable instance, however, the word retains its better meaning. In the Gospel of Matthew, the Magi appear as “wise men”- properly Magians, who were guided by a star from “the east” to Jerusalem, where they suddenly appeared in the days of Herod the Great, inquiring for the new-born kings of the Jews…. “

So we see that a Chief Mag is called a RAB. A MAGI would be a RABBI! Connecting the Magi of Finland with the Magi of the Bible.

At the bottom of the next page, 251, Raubenheimer added, “The Oera Linda Book showed that the Magy and the Magyarar in Scandinavia came from the East and that they practiced Shamanism. Archaeological, genetic and linguistic evidence points to their place of origin as the Altai Mountains where Russia, China, Kazakhstan and Mongolia meet. We have seen the similarities of these Magyarars with…

…the pagan priests and oracles in Greek mythology. In Hungary their name lives on as the Magyar. In Phoenicia, we identified them as the Gola, (Remember Golan Heights?) who gave rise to the Gauls and the Druids. They in turn influenced the Celts.

The pagan priests in India were of Sino-Mongolian descent and in empires of the Medes and the Persians they were known as the cultic Magi with their perverse theology. The Greeks referred to them as Magos.

In the new Strong’s dictionary of Hebrew and Greek words we find the following: Mag-os; of foreign origin, a Magian, i.e. an ORIENTAL Scientist, by implication a Magician- sorcerer, wise man.”

Isn’t it interesting that these same Magi who migrated to Finland, originated from the same area as the Khazarian Jews?

Land of Magog- Magi

But Raubenheimer doesn’t stop there, he makes another major connection with the Bible and the Land of Magog. He writes, “…we may realistically infer that the Magi in the Middle East and the Magy from Scandinavia, as well as some other shamanistic priests, originated from the Altai mountainous region in Western Mongolia. This leads us to another interesting deduction.

In the Bible, in Ezekiel 38:1-3, we find the following regarding the mysterious Gog of the Land of Magog: Now the word of the Lord came to me, saying, “Son of man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him, and say, “Thus says the Lord God; “Behold, I am against you, O Gog…

And in Ezekiel 39:1-2 gives us a clue to the locality of the land of Magog: And you, son of man, prophesy against Gog, and say, “Thus says the Lord God: “Behold, I am against you, O Gog, …and I will turn you around and lead you on, bringing you up from the far north, and bring you against the mountains of Israel.”

Raubenheimer concludes, “Biblical scholars have all along accepted that the name Gog means mountain. They thus deduced that this mountain must refer to the Caucasus Mountains to the north (of Israel).”

Look how similar the words MAGI- MAGOG-MAGYAR-MONGOL are.

Magi- Magog- Magyar- Mongol

Magog versus Frya

The most famous Mongol was Genghis Khan who ruled from this region, in the land of Magog. Genghis means Great, and KHAN means King. He proclaimed himself the Great King or Universal Ruler. And Khan is a variation of COHEN, which is the Jewish Priest Class. The COHEN is the King of the Jews, and some speculate that the name Genghis is a variation of the name Jesus. KING JESUS, KHAN GENGHIS. So this would be a title given to a “great ruler”.

Raubenheimer makes another good point here, “Without the Oera Linda Book, it is unlikely that this reconstruction would have been possible. (Hence Gobineau didn’t realize they WENT TO Finland, not originating there.) History has shown other invasions from that part of the world, such as that of the brutal Genghis Khan from 1206 AD onwards. The subsequent Mongol Empire extended from the Eastern shores of China right into Central Europe- arguably the largest land empire the world has ever seen.”

He continues, “In researching this book it became evident that the two groups of people in antiquity who had the most influence on Eurasian history were the Shamanists from Central Asia and the Frisians from Western Europe, in DNA terminology, the R1a and R1b haplogroups. The R1a group appears to have brought a permissive paganism and conquest by either deceit or military means, whereas the R1b group from Western Europe brought monotheism, technology and their fair share of conquests to the party. All other religions and civilizations were variants and compromises between these two groups.”

And it is a “war” to this day, between Magog and Frya. Enemies from the very beginning. And how important it is to show this connection in translations of the OLB, which Raubenheimer clearly did, and Ott clearly did NOT?

Ever wonder why Trump’s motto was Make American Great Again? MAGA is for the MAGI his overlords.

Now let’s look at another important example.

Cows with Golden Horns

We can see in Raubenheimer’s version that it says:

“When the MAGI got sniff of this he took the most attractive of his Finns and Magyarar and promised them COWS WITH GOLDEN HORNS to let them be taken in (employed) by our people in order to spread his doctrines.”

In Ott’s version he changes the line to read:

“When the MAGUS comprehended this, he selected the best looking of his Finns and Magyars and promised them MOUNTAINS OF GOLD if they could find acceptance among our people and then spread his doctrine.”

In the Original text this line reads:

“Tha thene MAGI that anda no kryg tha nam.er tha skensta synar Finna and Magiara. Vrlovande.ra KY MITH GOLDEN HORNA sa hja.ra thrvch vs folk fata dedon. Afterdam. sina ler vtbreda.

“KY MITH GOLDEN HORNA”. (Ky-Kuh-Cow not Berg- Mountain) It’s pretty obvious that means COWS WITH GOLDEN HORNS. He does put a sub note at the bottom saying “mountains of gold- lit: cows with golden horns (expression)”. But why do that?

‘Cows with Golden Horns’ would have us once again associate the MAGI of Scandinavia with the MAGI of the Middle East, their Bible and their Golden Calf worship of Moloch.

King Minos~ Minno

If we look to page 378 of Raubenheimer’s book, we learn of the adventures of Minno and his time on the island of Crete. This island was inhabited by Finda people, led by Magi (just like in Scandinavia). When the people learned of Freedom from Minno, they were ready to rebel and the Magi priests had to appease them by making some concessions. They took this out on Minno and tried to kill him by poisoning his food. He evaded them though when a Fryan ship sailed past and quickly hopped on board. These Magi worshiped the “COWS WITH GOLDEN HORNS” as well. Many ancient artifacts have been unearthed depicting these bulls.

Knossis~ Gnosis (The Gnostics)

On page 184, Raubenheimer writes, “In addition to the fact that they all seemed to have been oligarchies with similarities in superstition, religion and forms of worship, there are also references to CATTLE WITH GOLDEN HORNS. We read in the Oera Linda Book that the Magy in Finland and Northern Europe promised each of his subjects a COW WITH GOLDEN HORNS if they would infiltrate Frisian society. In Homer’s Odyssey, Ulysses made a special offering to the gods by having a HEIFER’S HORNS GILDED before the ceremony.”

Wall Street~ Bull Market

What do we see out in front of Wall Street in New York? The same COW WITH GOLDEN HORNS, still worshiped by the same MAGI.

So don’t you think Ott should have left the translation as is, and not change it to MOUNTAINS of GOLD?

Unless someone wanted to hide their identity.

Our Earliest History

Now let’s move on to the Fryan’s Creation Story. You will notice it is about THREE races, no more. There are no MIXED raced Magi present at this stage. So the only way they could learn of OUR creation story would have to be by word of mouth from FRYANS. This is not THEIR beginning.

Now let’s look at this sentence translated by Raubenheimer:

“This is our earliest history: WRALDA, who alone is good and eternal, made the BEGINNING, then came TIME. Time wrought all things, also the earth.”

In Ott’s version the line reads:

“This is our primal history: WRALDA, who alone is whole and eternal, created the POTENTIAL. Time began and wrought all things, the very Earth itself.”

And here is the Original text::

“That is vsa forma skednise. WRALDA, tham allena god and evg is. Makade t.ANFANG. Dana kem TID. Tid wrochte alle thinga. ak jrtha.”

So we can see that Raubenheimer stayed with Sandbach’s translation of “the BEGINNING” and Ott changed it to “the POTENTIAL”.

But if we look up the word ANFANG, we see that it means BEGINNING.

In English.

In Dutch.

In Western Frisian.

Nowhere does it mean POTENTIAL.

Now if we put in POTENTIAL we see it is POTINSJEEL in Western Frisian.

We see it is POTENZIAL in German.

And we see it is POTENTIEEL in Dutch.

Notice it does NOT say BEGINNING. And notice POTENTIAL IS NOT SYNONYMOUS WITH BEGINNING. They are NOT the same.

Now let’s look at the Original drawing of the three wheels from the OLB.

On the first wheel, and going clockwise, it says WRALDA. On the second wheel, it says T.ANFANG. On the third wheel, it says T.BIJIN. I do believe that the T in front of ANFANG and the T in front of BIJIN stands for TID (TIME).

The Original text again reads:

“That is vsa forma skednise. WRALDA, tham allena god and evg is. Makade T.ANFANG. Dana kem TID. Tid wrochte alle thinga. ak jrtha.”

Notice the order of the words I bolded. We see from the text, WRALDA, then ANFANG and then TID. TID would be BIJIN.

So the three wheels depict WRALDA, then THE BEGINNING, then TIME. Time is when Wralda puts the Beginning into motion.

TID is TIME and synonymous with BIJIN.

So why would Ott change the word BEGINNING to the word POTENTIAL? Who uses “the potential”? The same MAGI priests that we have been discussing.

It is used in the Kabbala, specifically in the Zohar, which is a section of the Talmud. And here we read THEIR version of the beginning. Chochma means, “the potential of what is” and is an emanation, a Sefirot, on the Kabbala Tree of Life. Remember Robert’s last name?

“A constant flux between BEING and non-BEING.”

So you can see that by inserting POTENTIAL into the story of “Our Earliest History” the MAGI are inserting themselves into it!

Not only do they INSERT themselves into it, they USURP our story for themselves as well. Take a look at the Wheel of Fortune Tarot card. You’ll notice it is the same six-pointed wheel as the wheels in the OLB. And this one has text wrapping around it as well. The Hebrew letters are for YHWH and the Roman letters spell TARO(T) clockwise and TORA(H) going counter clockwise. If we start at the bottom going clockwise we can add ROTA, which means Circle or Wheel. There is more to this image but the main point I’m trying to make here is that you can see how the MAGI have copied from FRYA. This is the same thing they did with the stories in their BABEL BIBLE. Taking Fryan stories throughout their history and using them for their own stories.

Side note* The wheel also spells AORTA, which is the CIRCULATORY (Circle) System that CARRIES blood to the HEART. So the wheel goes round just like the Aorta carries blood a round, both giving LIFE.

And remember how we mentioned the Theosophists/Luciferians? They also believe in the “ultimate potential”. It reads, “For Luciferians, enlightenment is the ultimate goal. The basic Luciferian principles highlight truth and freedom of will, worshiping the inner self and one’s ULTIMATE POTENTIAL.”

More Evidence in the Origination Story

Now let’s go further down page 351 in Raubenheimer’s book where we read:

“After the twelfth Yule festival she (earth) gave birth to three maidens:- Lyda out of GLOWING, Finda out of HOT, and Frya out of WARM DUST. When the last came, Wralda breathed his breath upon HER in order that men should be bound to him. When SHE was full grown SHE took pleasure and delight in the visions of Wralda. HATRED ENTERED THEM. They each bore twelve sons and twelve daughters; every Yule-time two. From this came all mankind.”

Now let’s see how Ott translated these lines. He writes:

“After the twelfth Yulefeast, she bore three girls: Lyda from glowing hot, Finda from hot, and Frya from warm substance. As THEY lay naked, Wralda fed THEM with his breath so that mankind would be bound to him. As THEY matured, THEY became fruitful and dreamed of pleasure. THEY RECEIVED WRALDA’S OD INTO THEM, and so they each bore twelve sons and twelve daughters; twins each Yuletide. All of mankind came from these.”

And here is the Original text from the OLB:

“After.et twilifte jol.ferste barde hju thrja man’gerta Lyda warth ut gliande, Finda warth ut heta. and Frya warth ut warme stof. Tha HJA blat kemon spisde Wralda hjam mith sina adama. Tilthiu tha manneska an him skolde bvnden wesa. Ring as HJA rip weron kreion HJA fruchda and nochta anda drama Wraldas. OD TRAD RA BINNA. And nw bardon ek twilif svna and twilif toghatera. Ek jol. Tid twen. Therof send alle manneska kemen.”

OD VERSUS EVIN

I couldn’t find OD in Afrikaans, Dutch, German or West Frisian, BUT in English we have ODD, which would be the OPPOSITE of EVEN. And later EVA was too sacred to say, so they would say EVEN for good. The opposite of EVEN is ODD, the opposite of GOOD is BAD, therefore ODD would represent BAD or HATE, coming in to the world. OD TRAD RA BINNA.

Sandbach took it from the Latin which means HATRED. And so Raubenheimer kept Sandbach’s translation as HATRED ENTERED THEM. Now if only Frya received the breath of Wralda (morals and laws within her heart), than it wouldn’t be a leap that the other two were jealous and thus HATRED ENTERED THEM.

We know that when Fryans build civilizations in non-Fryan lands, like in Athens for instance, the locals at first love the Fryans, but then eventually hatred enters them and they either killed all Fryans or ran them out of their lands. HATRED ENTERED THEM, is exactly what happens. And it makes sense that this is part of the “Earliest History” because they are teaching their Fryan brethren that it is in Lyda’s and Finda’s NATURE to HATE Fryans. Remember Lyda is GLOWING, and FINDA is HOT, only Frya has a moderate temperament, WARM DUST.

So this is a WARNING to FRYANS.

If you go with Ott’s interpretation, he has Wralda put the breath in ALL races, equally, and doesn’t differentiate them. Meaning, he puts a UNIVERSALIST spin on the Earliest History. Reminds me of Noah and his sons, black, white and yellow.

Also if we just look at the GRAMMAR, we see that HJA is SHE, that is SINGULAR, so it couldn’t be talking about all THREE getting Wralda’s breath. The first, the second and then the LAST. It is the LAST that gets his special breath. SHE took pleasure in his delight, not THEY took pleasure. So once again, he is still talking about Frya, the Last.

And if we look at Ott’s translation once again, THEY RECEIVED WRALDA’S OD INTO THEM, would imply that Wralda had sex with them. Yet if we look on page 226 of Ott’s book, Codex Oera Linda, he translates this sentence by the Burgh Matron Rika this way:

“Because they have borne children , they have themselves called ‘mother’ but they forget that Frya bore children WITHOUT BEING WITH A MAN.”

So Ott is contradicting his translation. Wralda could NOT put his OD into the three original “Mothers” and at the same time one of the mothers, FRYA, bore children without being with a man.

Raubenheimer’s version makes much more sense.

Eva in Our Hearts

Another reason why I believe the translation is, “WRALDA breathed his spirit upon her (FRYA)…” is because the OLB confirms this later in Minno’s Writings where he says in Raubenheimer’s translation:

“Wralda or Alvader (Father of All/God) has given me many years and I have travelled over many lands and seas and after all I have seen, I am convinced that WE ALONE WERE CHOSEN BY ALVADER TO HAVE LAWS. Lyda’s people cannot make laws nor obey them; they are too stupid and uncivilized. Many of Finda’s offspring are clever enough, but they are greedy, haughty, false, immoral and bloodthirsty.”

WE ALONE WERE CHOSEN BY ALVADER TO HAVE LAWS.

On the next page of Raubenheimer’s book we learn what exactly was put into Frya’s heart. We read:

“The word “EVA” is too sacred for common use, therefore men have learned to say, “Evin.” “EVA” means that knowledge which is implanted in the breast of every man in order that he may know what is right and wrong, and by which he is able to judge his own deeds and those of others.”

In Ott’s version on page 61 of Codex Oera Linda, we read:

“The word ‘AEWA’ is too sacred for common use. Therefore, we have learned to say ‘even’. AEWA refers to the rules that are imprinted equally in the hearts of all people, in order that they may know what is right and what is wrong, and by which they are able to judge their own deeds and those of others.”

When I first read Raubenheimer’s translation, I immediately thought of Eve from the Bible. And how EVE IS GOOD, and that the Bible takes this sacred name, makes EVE BAD, and applies it to ALL WOMEN saying they are the downfall of Man! Taking something that is so sacred, so good, and making it the reverse. Talk about MAGI tricks!

And so here we have Ott once again hiding this connection by changing the word to AEWA.

Here are the lines in the Original text so you can see for yourself:

“That word EWA is to fran vmbe an mena seka to nomande. Thervmbe het man vs evin seza lerth. EWA that seith setma ther bi aller manniska e.lik an hjara mod prenth send. Tilthju hja muge weta hwat rjucht and vnrjucht sy. And hwer thrvch hja weldich send vmbe hjara ajne deda and tham fon orum to birjuchtande.”

Notice too Ott’s, “imprinted equally in the hearts of all people” is more
equalitarian than Raubenheimer’s, “imprinted in the breast of every man”.

And I don’t think that Minno was thinking of the other races here, but meant “in the hearts of every Fryan.”

It reminds me of the writings of Thomas Jefferson and his term “all men are created equal” that he wrote in the Declaration of Independence, as a rally cry for his fellow citizens against the King of England. William Gayley Simpson writes, “It referred to equality of rights as between two groups of Anglo-Saxons and it could scarcely have occurred to Jefferson and his contemporaries that future generations would strain these words to refer to equality of innate capacity among different races. Jefferson’s published writings prove that he believed the Negro to be grossly inferior to Whites both in their mentality and in their character.” And I believe the same thought could have scarcely occurred to Minno when writing those lines in the OLB.

Passions Versus Addictions

Now let’s look under Frya’s Tex, which Raubenheimer translates as:

“Though him only can I recognize as free who is neither a slave to another nor to his own PASSIONS.“

Ott translates the line as:

“But only those can I consider as free whom is neither the slave of another, nor of an ADDICTION.”

The Original text reads:

“Thach thera allena mei ik as fry kanna ther nen slaf is fon en other ni fon sin TOCHTA.”

Ott does mention in his footnote that, “‘an addiction’ (SINE TOCHTA) …can have various meanings (cognate THOUGHT), but was usually used as PASSIONS here. However being “passionate” would not be negative.”

But he assumes PASSIONS to be positive and that’s not always true. Now what is wrong with doing that is that you take away from what the text is trying to teach us. We just learned from the Fryan Creation Story regarding Lyda, in Raubenheimer’s translation that,

“Of laws she knew nothing; her actions were governed by HER PASSIONS.“

So what is the text teaching us? To NOT be governed by our PASSIONS like Lyda is! Addiction is a modern term. And when we think of it we think of desiring something OUTSIDE of ourselves. PASSIONS are internal, they are something WITHIN ourselves, our nature, our character. THIS is what the text is teaching us. And THIS is the way Sandbach’s translation reads, and THIS is how Raubenheimer left it in his book.

Thoughts would be related to passions, internal, whereas addictions, would be related to external things.

Tranquil = Warm Dust

In addition we know too that Eva is exclusively in the hearts of Fryans by the next paragraph in Raubenheimer’s translation:

“There is also another meaning attached hereto. “Eva” also means TRANQUIL, smooth like water that has not been disturbed by a strong wind or something else. If the water is disturbed it becomes troubled, UNEVEN, but it always tends to become calm again. That is the NATURE, just as the inclination towards justice and freedom that exists in Frya’s children.”

Where it is mentioned that Eva “also means TRANQUIL, smooth like water that has not been disturbed,” this would align with WARM DUST, as what Frya was called. Remember Lyda was out of GLOWING and Finda was out of HOT. These are temperaments, their NATURES, that are being described. TRANQUIL is a temperament like WARM DUST. It is NOT talking about GLOWING and HOT, which would NOT be still. It is obvious that Eva is NOT in the hearts of all three, because the three have very different temperaments and the OLB is trying to teach the Fryans through this story to be WARY of the other two. So NO, it does NOT say as per Ott’s version:

“AEWA refers to the rules that are imprinted EQUALLY upon the hearts of ALL people.”

Also, remember the word OD? And how it is the OPPOSITE of EVIN? Well here we have “troubled” as UNEVIN. UNEVEN would be ODD. Once again proving that “OD TRAD RA BINNA” DOES mean HATRED ENTERED THEM.

True Light of Illumination

Here we have an interesting omission by Ott. If we look at the conclusion of Frya’s Tex, which are their most sacred laws, meant to keep the people safe and free, we read in Raubenheimer’s version:

“Its light shall always illuminate your intellect, and you shall always remain as free FROM FOREIGN DOMINATION as the sweet river-water from the salt water of the boundless sea.”

In Ott’s translation he writes:

“Its light will forever illuminate your mind and you shall remain as free FROM DOMINATION as your sweet rivers are free from the salt of the endless sea.”

In the Original text:

“That liucht thera. Skil than evg jvwe bryn vklarja. and j skilun than evin fry bilyva FON VNFRYA WELD as jvwa swite rinstrama fon that salte weter ther andelase se.”

We see in Ott’s version that the word FOREIGN has been omitted. Why? Well, who is our biggest threat today? The MAGI, which is a FOREIGN tribe that is living in our midst. A FOREIGN tribe that is trying to take over the world. A FOREIGN tribe destroying FRYA today!

In the Original text, “FON VNFRYA WELD” looks like ‘from unfrya (non-Frya) worlds’, so non-Frya would be FOREIGN.

Wralda’s Language

Konnered gives the Fryans some good advice. In Raubenheimer’s translation it reads:

“Here is my advice. If you wish that you alone should inherit the earth, you must never allow any language but GOD’S LANGUAGE to pass your lips, and take care that your own language remains FREE from outlandish sounds…

He continues:

“The language of the East Schoonlanders has been perverted by the VILE MAGYARS, and the language of the followers of KALTANA (CELTS) have been spoiled by the dirty GAULS.”

What were the languages that they spoke of back then? FINNISH and FRENCH! Neither Finnish nor French are Germanic Languages, yet are spoken by Fryans. We can see how the “vile Magyars (MAGI)” have corrupted our language from way back then and they are still doing it today.

They have a goal to enslave us. And that is exactly what is happening in the present. Our people tried to warn us with the writings of the OLB. Konnered continues:

“If they learn God’s language, then the words, “to be free” and “to have justice,” will come to them, and glimmer and glow in their brains until it becomes a flame, and that flame will consume all bad rulers and hypocritical and dirty priests.”

Here are a few examples of how the MAGI are STILL corrupting our language with their SPELLing today.

In songs. Gwen Stefani’s Hollaback Girl. Now write HOLLABACK in reverse. We get KCABALLOH. Sound it out. KABALLAH. Maybe she’ll write a song called TORIFES soon. Robert would be so proud.

And more obvious ones, like this name for a sporting goods company, called CABELA’S. If we stress the first syllable instead of the second like the common pronunciation, we get KABALLA’S.

And notice CABEL in CABELA’S. Just change the E and L around and you get CABLE.

Which is their Masonic noose worn on the initiate’s neck. The CABAL run the show. The KABBALA is their teachings used to control us. And the Mason’s are tools in their tool box.

A MASON. The most famous company even carries that name, Amazon. AMAZON~ A MASON. And the owner, Jeff Bezos is a MAGI. Are we surprised?

We need to follow Konered’s advice and, “take care that our own language remains FREE from outlandish sounds.”

So let’s briefly look at our Germanic languages and see how we can purify them. The languages are English, Icelandic, Faroese, Afrikaans, Frisian, Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, German, Dutch and Luxembourgish.

Notice if we look at the word for the feathered creatures that fly and sing beautiful songs, they all look similar except for English. Bird, Vogel, Fugl… we can see that BIRD is the ODD word out. Bird is NOT the Word. But do we have another word in English that means the same thing? Yes, of course. We have the word FOWL. FOWL would be the proper Germanic name for the winged feathered creature, NOT Bird.

FOWL

Here we see that BEAR is the correct word because it comes up very similar in all Germanic languages.

Cat is correct as well, although it would be nice to change out the C with a K. K is more often used in Germanic words, C with the Latin words.

KAT

Cow is correct since it is so similar to the other Germanic languages. But again, we should replace the C with a K, like we see they do.

KOW

We see DOG is NOT correct. But again we DO have an alternative word that IS Germanic that we could use, and that would be HOUND.

HOUND

So I hope I’ve convinced you to at least be a bit more cautious when reading, and watching things on the Oera Linda Book. And I hope it has inspired you to take another read of it. To really study it. I’ve read it probably a half dozen times already and with every read I have more epiphanies. I hope you will have the same enlightenment.

So ultimately we should see that language DOES matter. Translations DO matter. They change the purpose of the story. Remember the Burgh Matrons at the beginning of this presentation warned us, “Watch! Watch! Watch!” We know that “WATCH” has a double meaning. It means “TO BE WARY”, but it also infers “TIME”. Like the hands on a WATCH. So the Burgh Matrons are telling us that as Wralda’s Wheel is put into Motion we need to be Wary as we go through Time. That these are our life lessons. That our choices are put in motion on the Wheel and we are to learn from them.

Watch!

And a special thanks as always to my fellow Fryans who give these presentations their attention and love, and to my dear Fryans Scotland Sean, Danielle and Manfred De Vries who lent me their lovely voices.

Here is the YouTube version:

And here is the Bitchute version:

And here is a link to a good video that describes HOW we can get back to our Germanic (Fryan) Root Language.