I don’t mean to be a killjoy here, but if we learned anything from our awakening experience, its that we need to question everything. And yes, that would refer to DNA testing as well. I’m sure, like me, you’ve probably watched a bunch of DNA testing reveals on YouTube. And you’ll notice that so many people are shocked! That their results aren’t what they expected! I would say at least half fit into the “shocked” category.
I think the South Park creators know the truth about these DNA tests as well.
So when we pay an average of a hundred dollars per DNA test we are expecting to get pretty accurate test results right? I mean who would send in 100 dollars to find out that they really can only test 0.1% of the actual DNA and within that 0.1% there is only a small portion that they can actually test of your overall makeup. A good chunk is missing. I would consider 99.9% a decent sized chunk- that is MISSING. Would you still pay that money?
Would you still pay that money if you find out too that they fudge with the numbers even then? That they’ll add a little here and even throw in some “heritage” for shits and giggles?
http://www.cracked.com/personal-experiences-2522-inside-shady-world-dna-testing-companies.html
From cracked.com’s article, The Tests Aren’t As Accurate As They’re Claimed To Be, we read, the show Inside Edition had a set of triplets send their spit in to Ancestry.com and 23andMe, they got wildly different results from both services. Neither gave each triplet the same ancestry results — which, considering they all came from the same womb, is pretty weird. “Tests can be a crap shoot. For DNA tests, they use genetic markers, which are little variations in the DNA one or several groups may have, but others do not. The more markers there are, the more accurate the test will be.”
Some companies may use 12, 37, or 67, while others claim to use more than 700,000 different markers. Any of those numbers can sound impressive with the right marketing spin behind them, but the simple fact of the matter is that nobody’s method is perfect. “The best we can do is give a certain range based on those markers (or show who they are most similar to), and sometimes we’ll move up a percentage point of an ethnic group if it doesn’t add up to 100 percent.”
Inside Edition found differences of over 10 percent between the triplets they tested. That is not a small gap. If you were off by 10 percent on a DNA test, you could technically be a mouse. Maybe it’s unreasonable to expect perfect accuracy from saliva you mailed to a lab. But a lot of people do anyway, and Morgan winds up dealing with their complaints.
“At least once a week, we’ll get a call from somebody who took two or three other tests and then ours, and complains about how different they are. Usually it’s 5-20 percent off, but we got an email from a guy showing how in one test he was 7 percent Irish, Scottish, and Welsh, then on another he was 33 percent, and then on ours 45 percent, and he wanted to know what was wrong with everyone. We wrote to him that each test is different because of the number and types of genetic markers used, which can skew data, but he wrote back and said that we were con men.”
Genetics experts from the University of Texas and the University of North Carolina have gone so far as to say that these companies are preying on people, because they don’t truly have the information they need to pinpoint your origins on a map, and that it’s not possible to trace unique ancestry that way. As they put it, “That’s the beauty of this scam. The companies aren’t scamming you. They’re not giving you fraudulent information. They are giving you data, real data, and allowing you to scam yourself.”
Even though Morgan works for one of these companies, he doesn’t buy into the accuracy of the product. How could he? “We were doing our own internal tests when I started, and I took the same test five times in five weeks, and I got different results each time. One of the lab assistants wasn’t upset about it. He told me, ‘Look at the range there. That’s about where your ancestors are from.’ Somebody asked him, ‘We promise accurate results. How is it accurate if he got different results each time?’ And the lab assistant said, ‘If you average them all, you have a good idea, right?'”
On one hand, these tests are definitely a con. But on the other hand, the customers are as guilty as the companies. People want to know where they come from so they can brag about being 1/64th Cherokee in internet arguments. No one actually wants to spend hours studying genealogy and pay hundreds of dollars for a dozen different, possibly more accurate tests. “If you get a high percentage, it’s a safe bet that you have ancestors from there. I’m talking about a 50-60 percent on your test. Anything lower, and take it with a grain of salt.”
Morgan admitted to having changed people’s results. “We only did this on rare occasions, when we knew they weren’t using it as means to harm someone.”
One, that is unethical and two, how do you determine it won’t harm someone?
A lot of this is done under the guise of having the tests line up with what the business already knows of the customer’s expectations. It’s easier to do that than to deal with an endless parade of clients who are intensely pissed off because they aren’t as Dutch as they expected to be.
“If the results only added up to 99.5 percent, we’d say, ‘Let’s stick that 0.5 percent under Scandinavian.’ Other times, when we ask their family name (for women, their maiden name), and we see what country that last name came from, we’ll add it there, because they’ll be more proud of that heritage more often than not.” As scientific as DNA tests seem, we’re still talking about a customer-focused industry. It pays to suck up to the people who pay you.
“One woman sent the packet out with green shamrocks and a green leprechaun hat on it. She was really proud to be Irish. She even said she was excited to see if she was 100 percent Irish. But the test found no Irish blood. It was half Eastern Europe, then a mix of different places in Germany and Italy, and even Greece.” Clearly, this woman’s family had either lied to her, been lied to themselves, or she was one of those stealth adoptions that happen every so often. “The consensus was that she would send a huge fit if she was shown not to be Irish at all, so we made her 20 percent Irish and highlighted our disclaimer about results not being accurate.” Or they could have put down “100 percent” on St. Patrick’s Day and still technically be right.
They Will Screw With Racists.
“I only know of two times somebody wanted to be tested for being another ethnicity because they didn’t like that ethnicity. Both times, [they were] white people not wanting to believe they had black ancestors.” The first of these made an offhand remark that, “‘I’m hoping it will show people I’m not black.’ And not as a joke. He was serious.” The second customer was even less subtle: “He caught himself from saying the N-bomb. He said, ‘I want to know if any of my family are ni- black.'”
Perpetuating the “white racist meme” here. Remember, everyone else can be proud of their heritage and its not racist. Only white people are not allowed to be proud of theirs.
Morgan and his colleagues were caught between a rock and a really-want-to-mess-with-racists place. It would’ve been fun to throw a “10 percent West African” in there, but then they might have a pissed-off, dangerous person at their office, waving a gun. “Since we couldn’t do anything to the results (and we wanted to), what we did was add ‘< 1 percent’ to each African category of ethnicity. That way we weren’t lying, and they would both be wondering how much under a percentage point was. We always try to round to the nearest number because we sometimes hear about percentage points, but for them, we leave it open to whether it’s a one or a zero.”
It’s a compromise that’s elegant in its passive-aggressive simplicity. And it got a result. “The near-N-bomber wrote to us asking what that meant, and we wrote back that it meant it was under 1 percent. And we were not saying zero. Unless they got another test, that was going to bother them. Maybe they weren’t 100 percent Caucasian. I mean, they were, according to the results, but this way it leaves it open, and they’ll always be wondering. Bravo. Bravissimo!”
Wow, so it’s okay to mess with paying customers because of YOUR views on people? Who are the racists here?
They Uncover Hidden Family Secrets
“The number one reason they call us after they get their results back is to contest something that exposed a family secret. Sometimes it was a parent not really being their parent, or an orphan who didn’t know their history now finding out that they were half Native American this entire time and needing someone to talk to.” Obviously, that kind of news would be shocking for anyone. But sometimes it goes well beyond mere shock.
“From cops being treated differently.” Hmm… how would they know that the customer is even a cop? No where do you put your profession on what you submit for testing. Do we see how biased they are? To me they are trying to perpetuate the racist white cop myth. This just goes to show even more how UNRELIABLE these tests are.
“You would think there would be a lot of racists wanting black ancestry changed, but except for maybe two incidents, it hasn’t happened. Most white people who found out that they’re part black or part Native American have been quite accepting, if not a little excited.
Notice that’s the exact opposite of what Morgan said just a few paragraphs earlier. I think that ALL people would like to identify with their tribe. Its just human nature and nothing wrong with it. White people are being socially engineered to hate their race.
And black people who found out they’re part white have been the same way. It’s the sub-areas or implied ancestry that make people mad enough to call us.” Oddly enough, “most of our calls have been from people wanting to be changed from Italian.”
Here’s Stephen Colbert perpetuating the white racist myth.
Notice too that if you do a test in say, the UK, they’ll have you use a Q-tip and just rub around on your cheek and put that into the solution. So the amount of DNA is really tiny. I mean the Q-tip would only be slightly damp.
And if you do a test in the US they expect you to spit in a tube up to a particular line that takes a ton of spit to get to. Now does that make any sense? One location a tiny amount will do, in another you have to give up the ghost?
And when looking at the people and their results, I noticed a few things that made me go, what? How their DNA results are so INTERNATIONAL. Like really? It is only in the last two or three generations that people really started to travel all over the world.
But even then, how often does the average person travel to other countries? And how often does that person get pregnant with someone of that other country? I mean unless you move around a lot the chances are pretty good that you will mate with someone in your location. And only until fairly recently, even in White countries, there weren’t a lot of non-indigenous races.
This one is truly “every color of the rainbow”.
So what’s with all these DNA readings where the person’s DNA makes their family ancestry like an Amelia Earhart? Like they are a family of Globetrotters?
And then when it comes to inaccuracies, I saw one where a girl was 95% British and 5% American Indian. She was absolutely stunned. She’s lived her whole life in Britain and her whole family goes generations back on that island. But somehow she had AMERICAN Indian DNA?
They chalked it up to when some Indians came to Britain as a delegation. So you are telling me that these Indians who are total foreigners in Britain hung out at the local pub and went home with a nice Brit girl? Do you see how ludicrous this sounds? The Indians would have stayed with the Indians.
Just like we see Chinese communities, and Italian communities and Irish communities in the US, and Muslim communities, Pakistani and Jewish communities in the UK. The point being, yes, in our modern day many are brainwashed on the idea of multiculturalism and so are intermarrying, BUT it wasn’t like that until just recently.
I mean that’s the whole point of Prince Harry marrying Megan Markle. To give white European males the go ahead to date black women. Which is the Communist agenda, the complete mixing of the races, of ALL races, except for the Jewish race.
So with these DNA tests, since there is no way to prove their testing is inaccurate, they can give you whatever results they feel like. Like Morgan said in the previous article that they add in “black”. And they can also add in “Jewish”. I’ll show you an example of where this one came from shortly.
I remember when the Jews said they were not a race and therefore couldn’t be counted in the immigrant quotas to the US. How convenient for them? The Immigration Act of 1924 limited the number of immigrants allowed entry into the United States through a national origins quota. The quota provided immigration visas to two percent of the total number of people of each nationality in the United States as of the 1890 national census. So for the Jews because they argued they were a religion, not a race, this didn’t apply to them. So they could have Jews from a dozen different countries in the world, 24% would be allowed in, compared to 2% for everyone else.
BUT it seem apparent now they ARE a race because Ancestry DNA says so and even the Israeli government does because to live in Israel you have to prove your heritage on your mother’s side- so through mitochondrial DNA.
So I do feel they slip in some Jewish DNA just to mess with people, just like one DNA tester admits, and also so that person won’t protest against Jews. Because when you look at what’s going on in Europe you will find yes, the Muslims are coming over in great numbers, BUT the instigators, the ones that planned them coming over, the one that helped them get to Europe ARE the Jews.
Did they slip in the small percentage of Jewish DNA into this morning show hostess’ results? She seems fairly surprised and focuses on the other results not the Jewish portion. Did you notice that the representative for the test was Jewish? You know if she says anything against it she’s probably out of a job.
So in my opinion you can NOT rely on DNA testing to find out your true heritage. The best way to do it would be like the Germans do and that is trace your Family Tree back as far as you can go. To be certified Aryan you had to have three generations of Aryans on all sides of both the husband and wife. THAT Is the best way. Listen to your family. If your family is Italian, looks Italian, speaks Italian, were born in Italy, has an Italian last name, guess what? YOU are Italian.
If you trace your Family Tree you will probably found out your TRUE heritage. Who your TRUE tribe is. Isn’t that much more satisfying then some inaccurate test that tells you you are 2% Ashkenazi and 1% Bantu? Exotic or INACCURATE? Are you going to go around thinking you are NOW Jewish and African when you know your mother was from Romania and your father was from France?
Another thing, they say that brother and sister can have totally different readings. BULLSHIT. If they have the same parents they receive 50% from each parent. The DNA you received is throughout your entire body. You don’t have some German over here and some Spanish over there. Its not like some German can go to one daughter and the son got all your Spanish. I mean really? The crap they make up and people just buy it. You know WHY they say that right? So that you will BUY two tests instead of one. Hell, if you have ten brothers and sisters, get them EACH a test for Christmas and Ancestry DNA will be laughing all the way to the bank.
So I did a test just to see and I will share my results with you. So you can see my results here. 75% Europe West would be German for me. But the rest doesn’t fit with my Family Tree. My mother is 100% German. Her family are only Germans all the way back. My father had a German father and a mother that was half German and half English. So technically I would be 85% German and 15% English. So the 14% Ireland Scotland Wales should be English. Funny too how I know several people that are exactly 14% Ireland Scotland and Wales in their DNA test results! I think that is a common one that they throw in.
Also, tell an Irish, Scot or Welshman that they all carry the same DNA and they’ll probably pop you one in the kisser. Same with the French and Germans. Same DNA really? Germans DO share DNA with the Austrians and the Swiss, yet the Austrians come up in the Eastern European group? What? They are ALL Germanic people. That makes no sense. So I can grab that 8%, call it Austrian and add it to my German and THEN my reading would be more accurate. But see what I mean? We pay a hundred dollars to get accurate readings and we get nothing of the sort.
So the +3 other regions could totally be made up. Europe East 8%, Scandinavian 2% and Finland 1%. I think they just add in the general area because that would seem more plausible. And remember they added that “anything lower than 50% you can take with a grain of salt.” So the only true measurement on my test would be the Europe West, which is the German, which I know I am.
So no, I’m not a racist because I’m exposing this. I’m a TRUTH seeker and I’m tired of being lied to in every aspect of my life. I would like to at least know who my extended family is, who my tribe IS. But they don’t want that because they don’t want us to have this bond. They try to break up our tribes, break up our family , even break up our marriages. We are easier to control if we have very little bonds with others. THEY on the other hand KNOW Their heritage, know their tribe, have a ton of kids and group together in an Ethno state called Israel or Ethno communities like in New York or Amsterdam.
They want us to be like the people in Huxley’s A Brave New World. All mixed together into one controllable race.
So how are the results really gathered? In my opinion, they look through people’s family trees. The Mormons have the biggest data base on peoples ancestry’s. They collect them. If you have a last name that is Filipino, there is a good chance that if you get test results back that say you are Filipino you would agree.
If they can look into your family records through a search on the internet and probably in the Mormon database (you actually send your ancestry DNA samples to UTAH, ahem).That’s also why they let you buy additional test for your brothers, sisters, children. And then they add THEM to that Mormon database as well. So its a win win for the DNA companies. They get more info on you and they make a shit load of money- and you? You think you now know the truth about your heritage, which could be nothing close to the truth.
When Hitler wanted to prove his ancestry they looked back through his generations not by DNA. A certified Aryan wedding had to prove both man and woman had Aryan heritage back three generations. Hitler and Eva Braun had this done before they wed on April 29, 1945.
But of course they had to mess with Hitler.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/world-war-two/7961211/Hitler-had-Jewish-and-African-roots-DNA-tests-show.html
From The Telegraph on October 11, 2018, we read, Hitler had Jewish and African roots, DNA tests show, Saliva samples taken from 39 relatives of the Nazi leader show he may have had biological links to the “subhuman” races that he tried to exterminate during the Holocaust. Jean-Paul Mulders, a Belgian journalist, and Marc Vermeeren, a historian, tracked down the Fuhrer’s relatives, including an Austrian farmer who was his cousin, earlier this year. A chromosome called Haplogroup E1b1b1 which showed up in their samples is rare in Western Europe and is most commonly found in the Berbers of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, as well as among Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews. One can from this postulate that Hitler was related to people whom he despised,” Mr. Mulders wrote in the Belgian magazine, Knack.
Haplogroup E1b1b1, which accounts for approximately 18 to 20 percent of Ashkenazi and 8.6 percent to 30 percent of Sephardic Y-chromosomes, appears to be one of the major founding lineages of the Jewish population. Knack, which published the findings, says the DNA was tested under stringent laboratory conditions. “This is a surprising result,” said Ronny Decorte, a genetic specialist at the Catholic University of Leuven. “The affair is fascinating if one compares it with the conception of the world of the Nazis, in which race and blood was central. “Hitler’s concern over his descent was not unjustified. He was apparently not “pure” or ‘Ayran’.”
BUT from http://chelm.freeyellow.com/ydna.html, refutes this claim. “Many different types of people have the Y-DNA E1b1b1: “Haplogroup E is abundant in all regions in Africa and in some populations it makes up nearly 100% of the Y-DNA. It is a highly diversified haplogroup with many subclades that have unique histories and distributions, including regions outside of Africa in nearby Asia and Europe” (source: Genebase).
Finally, there are many different sub-clades of E1b1b. Concludes researcher Razib Khan, “Even within Europe most men who carry this set of markers are NOT Ashkenazi Jews.” Khan suggests that they test Alexander, a surviving great-nephew of Hitler.”
So we know why they want to make Hitler a Jew. But what is the purpose of throwing in a percent here and there into other people’s results? Well its to make us “Jewish” so we won’t speak out against them. Since they are the ones behind the forced mass immigration to Europe. If we are one of them, how can we talk against them?
In conclusion, it should be apparent that these tests are greatly flawed. That there is no way to really check to see if the results are authentic and the DNA companies don’t even guarantee their legitimacy. That it is just a deceptive racket to make these companies a shitload of money and push their multi-cultural agenda.
It’s just another tool in ((their)) tool box.
I tried to upload the vid to YouTube and they blocked it world wide. They cite the clips I added, but what’s funny is that the clips are FROM YouTube and NOT blocked on there. Not to mention that the use of the clips is supposed to be protected under Copyright Law of Fair Use, yet they don’t seem to care about the law.
But you can watch it on Bitchute:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BMwoFvWUjdsF/
Hi Rosette
So glad you did a video on this.I will send you my results via email They edomites jews Don’t want us White Israelites to know our history.
May Yahweh bless you Rosette
Many years ago when our Father taught me the truth about the “lost tribes of Israel,” I was elated. Then I started reading articles written by those claiming pure Hebrew blood lines and for a while I was destroyed, because I knew I was part Choctaw and not up to snuff. Then I read in my Bible the lineage of Christ, and found some gentiles in It, and I rembered that Joseph married an Egyptian princess, the daughter of a pagan priest no less, and I realized it’s the shed blood of Christ that matters— not our blood lines. He redeemed the whole flat Earth. I do believe I’m of the tribe of Ruben and that gives me some identity, but my real identity is in the Lion of the tribe of Judah. To Him I owe everything. . King David’s grandmother, Ruth, was a Moabite, and no amount of torture of the scripture will change that, or the flawed nature of all our other Hebrew relatives for that matter.. It’s our faith in Christ that makes us Israelites, not the purity of our blood lines. Is the White Race our Race? Yes, but there’s at least fifty shades of white! You can tell real diamonds from fakes by their flaws. Praise God, Christ came to save flawed sinners, of which I am Chief. Anyone claiming perfection is a fake, nothing but glass, when trials come they shatter. Lou 😎
very good comment lou
have a great day and better tommorrow.
Praise YAHWEH
Christopher Ollis
Even though that was not what my article was about I will address it since it is a big concern for you. And you seem to be aiming it at WHITE people. So if a Bantu person finds out they are 100% Bantu then they are nothing but glass? How about a 100% Native American are they nothing but glass? So we can’t be 100% European or we’re nothing but glass? Because I guarantee you that MOST people are still OF their tribe. I lived in the Philippines for a good number of years when I was little and I guarantee you again, that there are a ton of 100% pure Filipinos over there. Mixing of the races didn’t happen frequently in the past. When it did it made God very angry (IE. I hate Esau and I love Jacob. Noah was perfect in his generations.) It is a modern day phenomenon put in place by the Jewish Communist Agenda. Blood does matter. Our tribes DO matter. THEY want us to think they don’t. THEY want us to be one mongrel race with them ruling over us. That is their plan. BLOOD MATTERS. So MOST people can claim they are pure of their race, and they have NOTHING to be ashamed of and they make Yahweh happy. And no, they are NOT made of glass.
I’m a white man Rosette. My wife was white, my kids are white, several have blue eyes, my grandchildren are white, and I’m 100 percent in favor of being proud of my/our white heritage. My Mother was French as were her parents and their parents before them. My grandmother on my father side was Irish, and my grandfather was half Irish. Several years ago the President of Ireland was a Spring. As you know, that’s my last name too. I’m a descendent of Jacob/Israel and proud of it. I agree with you on almost everything you write, I read you regularly and reccomend you to family and friends. I think you’re brave and smart, and I apologize from the bottom of my heart for my glass /diamond comparison. It obviously failed miserably as an object lesson of God’s love of imperfect people such as myself. Please let me remain flawed but one of your true supporters, a member of the Israelite tribe of Ruben, a ridiculous old white man who just wants to get past this dust up over blood lines and return to normalcy, what ever that is. Lou
Well you don’t have to apologize and I need to speak my mind even if it ruffles feathers. We’ve been lied to and programmed for too long and we don’t have time to be prancing around issues. We have to get to the point and not mince words. Many people have come and gone both on YouTube and here on my website and I suspect that many acquaintances I have now will do the same. But the beauty of it is we pick up the people that are more aligned with us. So if we keep going we’ll find the people that are in a similar place in THEIR journey and we can at least walk that road together for a bit. A popular friend of mine, told me, you can’t please everyone, so just be you. Even THAT friend, I feel we are on a similar path, but can see where we don’t meet eye to eye. So my opinions might not be popular, might not be accepted, but no one can say they aren’t honest. They are what I believe at that stage in my journey. Blood DOES matter. That’s why the Jews use Christian BLOOD (of children mind you because of their purity) for their holidays, Passover, Purim and one other. (Can’t recall the third at the moment). That’s the MAIN REASON they’ve been kicked out of 179 countries! Blood Matters. We need to put that on a bumper sticker. It SURE DOES. It is the Dual Bloodline that divides us. One side Seth, One side Cain. Everyone pick your teams. You can’t sit on the fence. Time is short.
Hi Lou,
Since I didn’t know about Ruth being a Moabite and Moses marrying an Egyptian and how that would make Jesus of mixed race and how that didn’t sit right with me, I asked a friend who is more knowledgeable, his thoughts on the matter. With his permission I am sharing portions of our discussion here. I think it is important to cut through the mainstream programming, because there IS an agenda here. I want the truth and yes, I can handle it, and this is for others who can handle it too. From Mike M.- Ruth was a Moabite. BUT not by race, only by “location”. Geography versus ethnicity/race. This is causing trouble these days, it was causing trouble back then. Especially with the interpretations of such verses. Consider this. If I say, you are an American, and someone would say “oh, so you are black woman”, would that make any sense to you? This is the same problem with the word “Judean” (or “jew”). Ruth was no Moabite by race, and Christ’s blood is clean! Otherwise it would be a violation of God’s Law! Deut. 23:2-3 etc. He then cited Bertrand’s two works here: Ruth was an Israelite; Ruth was not a Moabite by Race – https://christogenea.org/podcasts/ruth-was-israelite-ruth-was-not-moabite race
Here we will make a critical presentation of Bertrand Comparet”s sermon, Ruth was an Israelite, offering our own commentary on Comparet’s original material, Clifton Emahiser’s notes on the sermon, and our own research in addition to theirs, hoping to edify and substantiate Comparet’s premise. This version of the sermon is available at Christogenea. It is from the book Your Heritage, which was digitized with critical notes by Clifton A. Emahiser:
“The territory of the Moabites was originally east and northeast of the Dead Sea. It extended from the Arnon river on the south to the Jabbok river on the north. Then their territory went from the Dead Sea and the Jordan river on the west, across the plains and foothills, into the mountains to the east. From the name of the people who lived there, it was called Moab. It kept that name for many centuries after all the Moabites were gone from it.
When the Israelites entered the promised land, after their 40 years wandering during the exodus, the land of Moab was the first land they conquered. Yahweh had commanded Israel to totally exterminate the occupants of the lands they were to settle, in Moab they did so.
At this time, about 1450 B.C. Sihon, king of the Amorites, had conquered and occupied the kingdom of Moab and was its ruler when the Israelites came in. InNumbers 21:26, 29 we read, “For Heshbon was the city of Sihon, king of the Amorites, who had fought against the former king of Moab, and taken all his land out of his hand, even unto Arnon. Woe unto thee Moab! Thou art undone, O people of Chemosh: he hath given his sons that escaped, and his daughters, into captivity unto Sihon, king of the Amorites.”
The Israelites conquered the land of Moab, killing all the people found there. We read in Deuteronomy 2:32-34, “Then Sihon came out against us, he and all his people, to fight at Jahaz. And Yahweh, our God delivered him before us: we smote him, and his sons and all his people. And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men and the women and the little ones, of every city: we left none to remain.”
From here, the Israelites advanced northward into the land of Ammon, Numbers 21:33-35 describes it. “And they turned and went up by way of Bashan: and Og, the king of Bashan, went out against them, he and all his people, to the battle at Edrai. And Yahweh said unto Moses, Fear him not: for I have delivered him into thy hand, and all his people and his land; and thou shalt do to him as thou didst unto Sihon, king of the Amorites, which dwelt at Heshbon. So they smote him, and his sons, and all his people, until there was none left alive: and they possessed his land.”
[…] “It’s like the mistaken conclusion by the majority that Ruth was a racial Moabite. Today, that untrue concept is being used by the enemy through nominal churchianity to promote multiculturalism. If one will consult Bertrand L. Comparet’s work Ruth Was An Israelite, one will see that the Israelites had driven the Moabites out of the land of Moab hundreds of years previous to Ruth’s time. Therefore, Ruth was only a Moabite geographically; not genetically…
To give you an example of what all these so-called “Bible experts” have little knowledge of, I will cite a case where nearly every bandstand would-be, adept on Scripture fumbles the ball. That is the story of Ruth. They will erroneously claim that Ruth was a “gentile Moabite” who became an ancestor of Yahshua Christ. Anyone who makes this declaration has little-to-no conception of what the Bible is saying.
This is not at all what the Bible teaches. Under the Joshua period, the Israelites killed and displaced the occupants of the entire land of Moab, and then reoccupied the land of Moab for themselves for 300 years. Please check the following scriptures: Num. 21:25, 29, 31; 33-35; Deut. 2:32-34; Deut. 3:12-16; 23:3; Judg. 11:12-26; Zeph. 2:9; Isa. 25:10. If at first you don’t understand the connection, reread these until you do understand. Ruth was merely an Israelite who dwelt in the land of Moab. Ruth was a Moabite only by geographic area rather than by genetics. Christ was of a pure bloodline all the way back to Adam. Rahab was also an Israelite.”
Numbers 21:29 explained that the Amorites had already conquered and taken the land of Moab which was in turn later conquered by the Israelites. Clifton’s notes concluded the following in relation to this:
To understand the chronological order of events, one must fathom that: Firstly, Sihon, king of the Amorites, had conquered and occupied the kingdom of Moab. Secondly, that after Sihon had absorbed the Moabites, Israel destroyed both the Amorites as well as the Moabites whom Sihon had conquered and brought under his rule. How absurd then is the false claim made by incompetent wannabe Bible teachers that Ruth was a racial Moabite!
Deuteronomy 23:3 contains the law which excludes Moabites from the assembly of Yahweh: “3 An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever.”
Judges 11:26 is a part of the protest of Jephthah to the Ammonites which, speaking in relation to the ancient land of Moab taken long before by the Israelites, says: “26 While Israel dwelt in Heshbon and her towns, and in Aroer and her towns, and in all the cities thatbe along by the coasts of Arnon, three hundred years? why therefore did ye not recoverthem within that time?”
We will discuss the importance of understanding the historical implications of Judges 11 and the law of Deuteronomy 23:3 in relation to the account in Ruth, after we finish with Comparet’s portion of this presentation. To continue with Comparet, where he is speaking of the lands of Moab conquered by Israel:
This entire area of the Jordan river was settled by the tribes of Reuben, Gad and half the tribe of Manasseh, after all the original inhabitants, Moabites and Ammonites, had been killed or driven out. In Deuteronomy 3:12-16 Moses tells us, “And this land which we possessed at that time, from Aroer which is by the river Arnon, and half mount Gilead and the cities thereof, gave I unto the Reubenites and to the Gadites. And the rest of Gilead, and all Bashan, being the kingdom of Og, gave I unto the half tribe of Manasseh. And unto the Reubenites and unto the Gadites I gave from Gilead even unto the river Arnon half the valley, and the border even unto the river Jabbok, which is the border of the children of Ammon.”
All of this was accomplished about 1450 B.C., from this time on this was purely Israelite territory. This was even more so than the land west of the Jordan river, because in the old lands of Moab and Ammon, none were left alive. Today, Anglo Saxon Americans who live in California are called Californians, bearing this name and living in a former Mexican territory doesn’t make them Mexicans. Likewise, pure Israelites living in the old land of Moab were often called Moabites, just as those who lived in Galilee were called Galileans.
Returning to Bertrand Comparet:
Three hundred years later, about 1143 B.C., we find evidence that the Israelite occupation of the lands of Moab and Ammon was still unbroken. In Judges 11:12-26we read, “And Jephthah sent messengers unto the king of the children of Ammon saying, What hast thou to do with me, that thou art come against me to fight in my land? And the king of the children of Ammon answered unto the messengers of Jephthah, Because Israel took away my land when they came up out of Egypt, from Arnon even unto Jabbok, and unto Jordan: now therefore, restore again those lands peaceably. And Jephthah sent messengers again unto the king of the children of Ammon, and said unto him, Thus saith Jephthah: when Israel came up from Egypt, and walked through the wilderness unto the Red Sea, and came to Kadesh; then Israel sent messengers unto the king of Edom saying, Let me, I pray thee, pass through thy land: but the king of Edom would not harken thereto. And in like manner they sent unto the king of Moab: but he would not consent. Then they went along through the wilderness and compassed the land of Edom and the land of Moab, and pitched on the other side of Arnon, but came not within the border of Moab: for Arnon was the border of Moab. And Israel sent messengers unto Sihon, king of the Amorites, the king of Heshbon; and Israel said unto him, Let us pass, we pray thee, through thy land into my place. But Sihon trusted not Israel to pass through his coast: but Sihon gathered all his people together and pitched in Jahaz, and fought against Israel. And Yahweh, God of Israel delivered Sihon and all his people into the hand of Israel, and they smote them: so Israel possessed all the land of the Amorites, the inhabitants of that country. And they possessed all the coasts of the Amorites from Arnon even unto Jabbok, and from the wilderness even unto Jordan. While Israel dwelt in Hershbon and her towns, and in Aroer and her towns, and in all the cities that be along the coasts of Arnon, three hundred years, why therefore did ye not recover them within that time?” The Israelites had held unbroken possession of the land of Moab and Ammon all that time.
Right in the middle of this period about 1322 B.C., or 130 years after the Israelites of the tribes of Reuben and Gad had occupied the land of Moab, Elimelech a man of Judah, with his wife Naomi and his two sons were driven by famine out of Judah.Ruth 1:1 records that he “went to sojourn in the country of Moab.” Note the accuracy of that expression, it doesn’t say among the people, but in the country of Moab, which was occupied by Israelites exclusively. Elimelech’s sons married women of this country, one of them being Ruth, who became an ancestor of David and through David an ancestor of Yahshua. She could not have been of any race except Israel, for no others lived there.
There was a country which continued to be called Moab and to belong to the Moabites, which was only a small portion of the original land. It was south of the river Arnon, bordered by the land given to the tribe of Reuben in the north, and by Edom in the south. David later subdued this remnant of the kingdom of Moab, and put it under tribute. Of course, no relationship of the original people of Moab to the king was ever mentioned in Scripture. If there was one, you would think that the Moabites would have tried to take advantage of it in order to relieve themselves of such tribute. In 2 Samuel chapter 8 we read:
1 And after this it came to pass, that David smote the Philistines, and subdued them: and David took Methegammah out of the hand of the Philistines. 2 And he smote Moab, and measured them with a line, casting them down to the ground; even with two lines measured he to put to death, and with one full line to keep alive. And sothe Moabites became David’s servants, and brought gifts.
If David were part Moabite through his great-grandmother Ruth, would the narrative omit any observation of that? Would the Moabites not protest their fate on the basis of kinship? But instead, Ruth was only a Moabite by geography, because she came from the land to the north, which had formerly also belonged to the Moabites, but now belonged to Israel.
END QUOTE
See also
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/women-genealogy-christ-06-21-09
https://comparet.christogenea.org/sermons/ruth-was-israelite-upgrade
“Negro” wife of Moses. From “Whom did Moses marry” by Bertrand L. Comparet https://comparet.christogenea.org/sermons/whom-did-moses-marry
“You are all familiar with the saying, “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing”. A little knowledge is never enough. It never gets beyond half truths which mislead people into false beliefs. This is consistently true in the field of religion, more than in all other areas. They think they have found a fallacy in the Bible’s great truth that Yahweh’s people Israel are known today as the Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian and Teutonic people. Israel is, and always has been, under Yahweh’s command to keep their race pure.
One challenge I frequently get is, “Why shouldn’t whites marry negroes, Moses married an Ethiopian woman?” They base this on the way Numbers 12:1 reads in the King James Bible. “And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married; for he had married an Ethiopian woman.” Christianity has never labored under a greater curse than the many mistranslations in the King James Bible. Some of these mistranslations are even followed in some other translations because these errors have become traditional. Bible scholars know that there are many thousand mistranslations in the King James Bible.
The eminent scholar Robert Young, author of Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible and of Young’s Literal Translation of the Bible, says in the preface to his Literal Translation, “In the King James Bible, there are scarcely two consecutive verses where there isn’t some departure from the original. These variations may be counted by the tens of thousands, as admitted on all hands.”
When you think you have found some discrepancy in Yahweh’s word, which can be used as the foundation for conflicting doctrines, we can never safely rely upon what we find in the English translation, until you have checked it in a good lexicon. The best reference is the Hebrew and Greek dictionaries used in Strong’sExhaustive Concordance, which is more thorough than most of the others. We often find that defective scholarship in early translations, has become accepted as doctrine. It is continued, although the original word will not support the meaning given it in the translation. Let’s get back to Moses and his wife. In Numbers 12:1, the Hebrew does not say Ethiopian it says Cush, a descendant of Cush, or a resident of the land of Cush. Remember that Noah had three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth. Genesis 10:6 tells us the sons of Ham were Cush, Mizraim, Phut and Canaan, Noah and his wife were both white, so all their children naturally were of the same race.
One of Ham’s sons was Mizraim, meaning Egyptian. We know from all the Egyptian art, including their marvelously fine portrait sculpture, during all the many centuries of Egypt’s greatness, they were a pure white people. In fact during this time, any negro found in Egypt, other than a slave working in chains in the fields, was summarily killed on sight. Ham’s other son Cush was, without question, also white. What about the land of Cush?
There were two different countries named Cush in Bible times, one was Ethiopia, lying south of the Sudan in Africa. There was another Cush that was in eastern Mesopotamia, or what at other times was part of the Babylonian empire. These people were not a black race at any time. This Cush flourished about 1500 B.C., during the time of Moses, the exodus from Egypt occurred in 1486 B.C.. Who can we expect to find living in this Cush, on the east side of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, from what people that lived there did Moses take his wife? Note there is absolutely nothing anywhere in the Bible which says, or even hints, that Moses was ever in Ethiopia or any place else, where he could have found a negro woman to marry. The Bible does tell us where Moses got his wife, or who she was. Remember Moses had killed an Egyptian who was beating an Israelite.
In Exodus 2:15-21 we read, “Now when Pharaoh heard this thing, he sought to slay Moses. But Moses fled from the face of Pharaoh and dwelt in the land of Midian; and he sat down by a well. And the priest of Midian had seven daughters: and they came and drew water, and filled the troughs to water their father’s flock. And the shepherds came and drove them away: but Moses stood up and helped them, and watered their flock. And when they came to Reuel their father, he said, How is it that ye are come so soon today? And they said, An Egyptian delivered us out of the hand of the shepherds, and also drew water enough for us and watered the flock. And he said unto his daughters, Why is it that ye have left the man? Call him, that he may eat bread. And Moses was content to dwell with the man: and he gave Moses Zipporah his daughter.”
We know positively from this, that Moses married the daughter of the priest of Midian. His name Reuel means, friend of God, it is given in the variant form of Raguel in one or two places. Sometimes he is called Jethro. Jethro is the Hebrew word Yithro and means his excellency, this is a title of respect, not a name. Who were the Midianites, from whom Moses got a wife?
Genesis 25:1-2 tells us that after the death of his wife Sarah, “Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah. And she bore him Zimram, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah.” Midian was a son of Abraham. Abraham had been told by Yahweh the great promises would be fulfilled by his son Isaac, not through any of his other sons. Therefore he gave his inheritance only to Isaac, but he loved his other sons also and dealt fairly with them. Genesis 25:6 tells us, “But unto the sons of the concubines which Abraham had, Abraham gave gifts, and sent them away from Isaac his son, while he yet lived, eastward into the east country.”
Logically, he would want them to move more than just a few miles away, as the whole idea was to send them far enough away that they would not be neighbors of Isaac, and perhaps quarrel with him over the inheritance. The next place of any importance to which they could go was Cush. Cush was in the valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, the same country which at other times was part of the important Babylonian empire. So Midian and his descendants became Cushites, people living in the kingdom of Cush. Remember though, that by race they were descendants of Abraham, closely related to Isaac and his descendants the Israelites. However, they remained a separate nation and never became part of Israel. Since this is the only wife the Bible tells us Moses had, it is clear she was a Midianite, whose family lived in Cush in the Tigris and Euphrates valleys. This is where Moses would logically have found his wife.
Moses fled for his life because the Pharaoh of Egypt wanted to kill him. Moses could not have gone to just some tiny neighboring kingdom to stay. A neighboring kingdom would not have dared to give Moses shelter, but would have turned him over to Pharaoh as soon as the Egyptians learned he was there and made a demand for him. Therefore, Moses fled a safe distance, to a land where the people did not live in fear of the powerful Egyptian empire. He went to Cush, among whose people were the Midianites.
We may be certain Moses never married a negro. Remember he was brought up in Pharaoh’s palace as the adopted son of Pharaoh’s daughter. He was educated as an Egyptian of the royal family. The Egyptians considered the negroes as wild animals, to be killed on sight. The son of royalty would not take a wife from the negro Cush in Africa. It was while Moses was guarding the flocks of his father-in-law, the priest of Midian, that Yahweh appeared to him in the burning bush. This was when Moses was commissioned by Yahweh to go to Egypt to set Yahweh’s people Israel free.
When Moses returned to his own people, he taught them their proud heritage as Yahweh’s people Israel. He also taught them that they must keep their race pure. His brother Aaron and his sister Miriam taunted Moses about his marriage outside the strictly limited group of Israel.
It is true Moses had married a woman who was not an Israelite. However, she was not only a white woman, but a descendant of Abraham, a close relative of the Israelites. So this matter of the wife of Moses can’t be used as a justification for race mixing, Moses did not marry outside the white race, just outside his nation. Mongrelization is equally a sin against both races. Yahweh had His own purposes in mind when He made the different races. Each was made suited to the purpose Yahweh had planned for it. To lose that suitability by mixing it with another race is to defy Yahweh, the results of this are always bad.
Critical note by Clifton A. Emahiser: I agree with Comparet’s conclusion that Moses did not marry out of his race, but I cannot agree with him when he stated: “Mongrelization is equally a sin against both races.” Nor can I agree with Comparet when he further stated: “Yahweh had His own purposes in mind when He made the different races.” Incessantly, time and again in Genesis we read the words “… after it/his kind: and Yahweh saw that it was good …” But were all the non-Adamic races “after it/his kind” and did Yahweh “see” that they were “good”? Yes, mongrelization is a sin against the White race, but what if the other races were bad from the beginning?
Yahshua Christ at Matthew 13:47-50 definitely stated there were a “good” racial kind and a “bad” racial kind. I will now convey this passage in its proper context: “47 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that wascast into the sea [of people], and gathered of every kind (meaning race): 48 Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good [racial kind] into vessels, but cast the bad [racial kind] away. 49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50 And shall cast them [the bad racial kind] into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.” Don’t get mad at me, these are not my words, but Christ’s, and He was the Creator, so He surely should know.”
END QUOTE
Hi Rosette,
Very telling and important video for our people they don’t want us to know who we are.
Have sent you my results.
Yahweh knows all.We are his battle axes destroying the father of lies.
Have a great day and better tommorrow